Review



rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8  (ZenBio)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    ZenBio rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8
    Cell counts of every cluster in two samples.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Antibodies Against Human Cd8, supplied by ZenBio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8/product/ZenBio
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Gastrointestinal stromal tumors regulate macrophage M2 polarization through the MIF/CXCR4 axis to immune escape"

    Article Title: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors regulate macrophage M2 polarization through the MIF/CXCR4 axis to immune escape

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1431535

    Cell counts of every cluster in two samples.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Cell counts of every cluster in two samples.

    Techniques Used:

    Immunohistochemical characterization of CD8, CD68, MIF, CD206 and CXCR4 in GIST samples.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Immunohistochemical characterization of CD8, CD68, MIF, CD206 and CXCR4 in GIST samples.

    Techniques Used: Immunohistochemical staining

    (A) (A) There were differences in CD8+T cell infiltration among different groups (0.35 ± 0.15 vs 0.27 ± 0.10 vs 0.09 ± 0.02, P =0.003); (B) There were differences in the infiltration of CD68+macrophage cells among different groups (0.38 ± 0.09 vs 0.64 ± 0.17 vs 0.98 ± 0.19, P =0.03). (B) (A) As the risk increases, the expression of CXCR4 gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.43 ± 0.24 vs 0.90 ± 0.68 vs 1.64 ± 0.53, P <0.001); (B) As the risk increases, the expression of MIF gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.009 ± 0.003 vs 0.70 ± 0.02 vs 0.12 ± 0.03, P <0.001); (C) As the risk increases, the expression of CD206 gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.04 ± 0.01 vs 0.07 ± 0.0.02 vs 0.15 ± 0.03, P<0.001); The statistical method is non-parametric test, n=80, * P <0.05; ** P <0.01.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) (A) There were differences in CD8+T cell infiltration among different groups (0.35 ± 0.15 vs 0.27 ± 0.10 vs 0.09 ± 0.02, P =0.003); (B) There were differences in the infiltration of CD68+macrophage cells among different groups (0.38 ± 0.09 vs 0.64 ± 0.17 vs 0.98 ± 0.19, P =0.03). (B) (A) As the risk increases, the expression of CXCR4 gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.43 ± 0.24 vs 0.90 ± 0.68 vs 1.64 ± 0.53, P <0.001); (B) As the risk increases, the expression of MIF gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.009 ± 0.003 vs 0.70 ± 0.02 vs 0.12 ± 0.03, P <0.001); (C) As the risk increases, the expression of CD206 gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.04 ± 0.01 vs 0.07 ± 0.0.02 vs 0.15 ± 0.03, P<0.001); The statistical method is non-parametric test, n=80, * P <0.05; ** P <0.01.

    Techniques Used: Expressing



    Similar Products

    rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8  (ZenBio)
    90
    ZenBio rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8
    Cell counts of every cluster in two samples.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Antibodies Against Human Cd8, supplied by ZenBio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8/product/ZenBio
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Cell counts of every cluster in two samples.

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    Article Title: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors regulate macrophage M2 polarization through the MIF/CXCR4 axis to immune escape

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1431535

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Cell counts of every cluster in two samples.

    Article Snippet: Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were performed on the tissue microarray with the following antibodies: rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human CD8 (ZEN Bio, Lot No:10011860), CD206 (Protein tech, Lot No:00080496), MIF (ZEN Bio, Lot No:20200101), and CXCR4 (ZEN Bio, Lot No: BJ10221968), and monoclonal mouse antibody against human CD68 (Abcam, Lot No:00098190).

    Techniques:

    Immunohistochemical characterization of CD8, CD68, MIF, CD206 and CXCR4 in GIST samples.

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    Article Title: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors regulate macrophage M2 polarization through the MIF/CXCR4 axis to immune escape

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1431535

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemical characterization of CD8, CD68, MIF, CD206 and CXCR4 in GIST samples.

    Article Snippet: Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were performed on the tissue microarray with the following antibodies: rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human CD8 (ZEN Bio, Lot No:10011860), CD206 (Protein tech, Lot No:00080496), MIF (ZEN Bio, Lot No:20200101), and CXCR4 (ZEN Bio, Lot No: BJ10221968), and monoclonal mouse antibody against human CD68 (Abcam, Lot No:00098190).

    Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining

    (A) (A) There were differences in CD8+T cell infiltration among different groups (0.35 ± 0.15 vs 0.27 ± 0.10 vs 0.09 ± 0.02, P =0.003); (B) There were differences in the infiltration of CD68+macrophage cells among different groups (0.38 ± 0.09 vs 0.64 ± 0.17 vs 0.98 ± 0.19, P =0.03). (B) (A) As the risk increases, the expression of CXCR4 gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.43 ± 0.24 vs 0.90 ± 0.68 vs 1.64 ± 0.53, P <0.001); (B) As the risk increases, the expression of MIF gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.009 ± 0.003 vs 0.70 ± 0.02 vs 0.12 ± 0.03, P <0.001); (C) As the risk increases, the expression of CD206 gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.04 ± 0.01 vs 0.07 ± 0.0.02 vs 0.15 ± 0.03, P<0.001); The statistical method is non-parametric test, n=80, * P <0.05; ** P <0.01.

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    Article Title: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors regulate macrophage M2 polarization through the MIF/CXCR4 axis to immune escape

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1431535

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) (A) There were differences in CD8+T cell infiltration among different groups (0.35 ± 0.15 vs 0.27 ± 0.10 vs 0.09 ± 0.02, P =0.003); (B) There were differences in the infiltration of CD68+macrophage cells among different groups (0.38 ± 0.09 vs 0.64 ± 0.17 vs 0.98 ± 0.19, P =0.03). (B) (A) As the risk increases, the expression of CXCR4 gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.43 ± 0.24 vs 0.90 ± 0.68 vs 1.64 ± 0.53, P <0.001); (B) As the risk increases, the expression of MIF gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.009 ± 0.003 vs 0.70 ± 0.02 vs 0.12 ± 0.03, P <0.001); (C) As the risk increases, the expression of CD206 gradually increases, and the difference is statistically significant (0.04 ± 0.01 vs 0.07 ± 0.0.02 vs 0.15 ± 0.03, P<0.001); The statistical method is non-parametric test, n=80, * P <0.05; ** P <0.01.

    Article Snippet: Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were performed on the tissue microarray with the following antibodies: rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human CD8 (ZEN Bio, Lot No:10011860), CD206 (Protein tech, Lot No:00080496), MIF (ZEN Bio, Lot No:20200101), and CXCR4 (ZEN Bio, Lot No: BJ10221968), and monoclonal mouse antibody against human CD68 (Abcam, Lot No:00098190).

    Techniques: Expressing